US Politics And Foreign Policy Essays - Politics Of Quebec

US Politics and Foreign Policy Letter to the editor, Re: American Reluctance After decades of so called healthy, democratically provoked American military intervention in Central America, why is it the U.S. is reluctant to invade Haiti and restore the popular, and of course, democratically elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide? What is Mr. Aristide? Basically, he is a social democrat, who has seen and is dedicated to helping the poor. He was attempting to improve the lives of the indigent Haitians through some redistribution of wealth and land reform, which are initiatives abhorred by all previous, and maybe following, U.S. administrations. What of George Bush? You could say that these are totally incompatible with the so called "new world order" planned out by Mr. Bush. With some other Central American countries in mind, we should be looking out for the intervention of the American CIA, which could show yet another example of American intervention to topple elected governments which do not fit to their standards or liking. Letter to the Editor, Re: How would Quebec's separation affect us? Watching the crumbling situation in Quebec, (almost crumbling literally, due to Olympic Stadium, the billion dollar fizzle) it is interesting to think what would happen if they did separate? Would Canadians be in too bad a mood to negotiate with Quebec if they separated? Question is, would they negotiate at all? If Quebec did separate, the border ramifications would be just astronomical, trade routes would be chopped off, and a whole number of other things just too much to explain. Reading an article about a speech that external affairs minister Joe Clark was presenting jogged my mind a bit. Talking about the serious costs if Quebec separated, such as the free trade treaty with the U.S., I thought what about a new economic union. Would Canada sit and negotiate one with Quebec? Answering all these questions was Mr. Clark in his speech. Most of us haven't heard it, more or less heard of it. But it brings home a shocking message: What if they did separate? Do you really care? Do you care if it only affects you directly? Do you just pay your taxes and parking tickets, shut up and go about your daily business, as usual, without thinking one thing about where the your company, in which you are employed, is? What if the head office is in Quebec? Does it affect you directly? Or will you just shrug it off and go reach for your unemployment check? THINK about it! It won't just be business as usual after separation. Letter to the editor, Re: P.E.I. distinct? "P.E.I. tells unity hearing it's a distinct society, too." More people wanting this little two word, huge affect sentence pasted onto their province. Island politicians argued that their tiny size and unique geography makes them a distinct society. What bout the Territories? Do we live in igloos? Do we catch whales and seals to live on? And what of the people in P.E.I.! We musn't forget them, the people who eat potatoes, like we do, live in houses, like we do. Geography? Is P.E.I. more isolated than the Northwest Territories? If anyone should be a distinct society, the native people of Canada should, the people that were here before the people who thought of the word Quebec, and before Prince Edward was here to have an island named after him.